Navy Pilots Save The Day In First-Ever Dhruv Ditching

A Dhruv Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH) from Indian Navy’s newly acquired fleet of ALH Mk-3 MR ditched close to the coast off Mumbai in the forenoon hours of Mar 8, 2023. As per a navy statement tweeted by Livefist Defence, the helicopter experienced “sudden loss of power and rapid loss of height”. The crew (two pilots + one aircrewman diver) who managed to carry out a controlled ditching exited the aircraft and were recovered safely.

Indian Navy press statement as tweeted by Livefist Defence

First Naval ALH accident

This marks the first-ever serious accident of Indian Navy’s ALH fleet since the Intensive Flight Trials Unit (IFTU) was first set up at INS Garuda, Kochi, in 2003. While there have been over 17 major accidents of the ALH across other services, the navy and coast guard had not lost a single ALH from their total inventory of 12 Mk-1 (8 IN + 4 CG) and 16-each Mk-3MR. The unblemished record of two decades got a salty wash with an unplanned ditching near Prongs Light, Mumbai.

Ditched naval ALH IN 709 floating evenly on EFS (pic from social media; source unknown)

As per pictures that were shared on social media, the frame number appears to be IN 709. The helicopter has been retrieved almost unscathed thanks to some exceptional piloting & providence. Subsequent sequence of events where SAR, crash & salvage agencies managed to keep the helicopter afloat till it was hooked up and brought ashore bears testimony to the alertness & proficiency of these agencies. It also makes easy the process of retrieving crucial evidence linked to the crash.

Mumbai’s naval helibase INS Shikra is home to the latest ALH Mk-3 MR that replaced the Chetak SAR flight about two years ago. Frame number IN 709 that ditched Wednesday is possibly among the first of the sixteen MK-3 MR that were procured from HAL with Indian Coast Guard as lead service. These are brand new machines that have only flown a few hundred hours. Just two days before the ditching, Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh alighted from one on INS Vikrant for a ‘day at sea’.

RM Rajnath Singh on INS Vikrant (pic from RM’s Twitter)

Copybook ditching after a critical failure

All IN & CG ALH are equipped with Emergency Flotation System (EFS) for safely ditching in water in case of critical emergency. The EFS comprising a set of floats are auto-inflated on water contact, with an emergency override should the automatic mode fail. All navy/CG crew are given exhaustive helicopter underwater egress training (HUET) at navy’s state of the art water survival training facility (WSTF), at INS Garuda, Kochi. There have been a couple of cases of accidental inflation of EFS on the naval ALH fleet, but none where the helicopter was forced into the ground or water.

Initial reports & pictures indicate the ill-fated helicopter floating upright in calm sea on emergency floats that operated to intended purpose. This indicates good returns on all the hours of diligent training (flight simulator, on-type training, HUET, water survival training etc). All ALH pilots of Indian armed forces undergo rigorous training at the level D full-flight simulator HATSOFF at Bengaluru. Although late to cash-in on this facility, the few good men who pushed Navy’s case for sim training and the instructors/pilots who trained/benefited from it must be smiling. Financial advisors and the odd sceptic inside the service who hesitate to sign on sim training contracts can now see for themselves the rich dividends from moneys spent on such training.

Salvage of IN 709 in progress (pic from social media; source unknown)

Within hours of the ditching, photos and videos of the ditched helicopter and salvage operation went viral on social media. Corroborating navy’s statement with the available footage, it is evident that the crew ditched the helicopter admirably well. The EFS inflated evenly. Rescue & salvage teams reached the spot without undue delay. Salvage parties managed to hook up additional floats to enhance buoyancy of the ditched helicopter. Floating cranes lifted the wreck cleanly and the same was brought ashore. This is the very first navy ALH ditching and there is every reason to believe that it went to plan. Moreover, with the airframe intact and the ALH being equipped with cockpit voice and flight data recorders, i think the navy has all the evidence they need to nail this one. The rest is a matter of administrative minutiae and follow-up action — the latter always a difficult proposition when it comes to well-entrenched aerospace majors and their captive customers.

Fleetwide grounding, but no cause for alarm

As per media reports, the navy and ICG suspended ALH operations soon after the ditching. As of late evening on Mar 10, media sources report the entire ALH fleet across services has been grounded, possibly for essential one-time checks. This indicates that the navy has perhaps found (and shared) potential evidence of catastrophic failure that may affect all marks of the ALH. Such grounding for one-time checks in the wake of major accidents is standard procedure and usually comes from recommendations of the AAIB or technical directorate in our system. Ideally it should come from the OEM, but perhaps that’s asking for too much around here. The grounding is neither a cause for alarm nor is it indicative of any firm conclusion which will form the subject of a detailed inquiry. That work is now underway.

Fatal flaws unheeded?

Once we are done celebrating the safe outcome of this ditching, it is time for some serious conversations. The ALH fleet has seen some major accidents caused or attributed to critical failures in the flight control chain. Going by the navy’s statement of “sudden loss of power and rapid loss of height” the latest accident bears a startling resemblance to previous instances of control failures, including the Oct 2019 crash with army’s Northern Commander onboard. Yet another army Rudra crashed suddenly near Migging, Arunachal Pradesh in Oct 22 killing all onboard. To date, there has been no public statement on the likely cause of that accident either. Hope the spectre of ‘collective failure‘ has not returned to haunt us.

There have been at least four or five reported cases of sudden loss of control on the ALH due to breakages in flight control rods or boosters that provide longitudinal, lateral and collective control leading to accidents. We still don’t know what brought down the ALH ex-IAF’s Bareilly base on ferry after major inspection; the crew fighting to gain control over the stricken helicopter all the way down to their death. In other accidents, people lived to tell the tale due to pure providence, extreme skill or a combination of both. It is evident that not enough has been done to fix these fatal flaws and we continue to kick the can down the road for pilots to handle. Such failures, if detected, are one too many — unacceptable for a certified helicopter.

Salvaged IN 709 onboard, seen here with the EFS still intact (pic from social media; source unknown)

Atma Nirbharta and safety management

In the inter-service jostling for meeting ambitious atma nirbharta targets, we must not lose our focus on safety. Seventy two hours after the ditching and a fleetwide grounding, there was no public statement from HAL on the matter nor do the certification authorities seem to have taken any cognizance of repeated failures. This does not augur well for any side, given that HAL is, by all indications, rising as the one-stop-shop for all helicopter needs of the services. If not fixed in time, flaws in design, production, quality control or certification will also impact the civil and export potential of the helicopter. It just makes a lot of sense for all stakeholders to come clean on accidents on our own home-made helicopter that stem from either design or production flaws. There’s much more at stake than reputation — safety and longevity of all subsequent derivatives (LCH, LUH, IMRH) for instance.

The naval BoI must dig deep, enlisting where required, subject matter experts and requesting tri-service data on catastrophic failures. Crucial safety information from this accident must be shared with all civil and military users, especially ICG who is doing the lion’s share of flying on the wings of an expensive PBL contract. Most importantly, follow-up action must come in time and fatal flaws must be fixed jointly by HAL and the forces — more than 350 of these machines form the backbone of vertical lift in the Indian military and the customers have nowhere else to go.

On the brighter side, we’re fully ‘atma nirbhar‘ in ditching now! This is the first time an indigenously designed & developed helicopter has been successfully ditched with EFS against daunting odds. Cheers to the brave young crew of IN 709 who kept their calm, overcame startle effect, fell back on a decidedly difficult and unscripted manoeuvre practised in the simulator, and ditched the stricken helicopter in an exemplary manner. BRAVO ZULU. Kaypius applauds you. The navy and HAL should too.


©KP Sanjeev Kumar, 2023. All rights reserved. I can be reached at or on my Twitter handle @realkaypius. Views are personal. All photos have been sourced from social media; credits unknown.


7 thoughts on “Navy Pilots Save The Day In First-Ever Dhruv Ditching

  1. Deft, exceptional handling by the Crew. Bravo Zulu.

    Also, serious introspection required by HAL.

  2. How about govt mandating ALHs for elections and all official movements of VIPs round the year.

    1. LMAO !!They re not going to risk their fat sorry asses on the ALH !! Thats solely for captive customers. But if it ever does happen, that would be the day Peeush. Till then its our 145/412/139s to the forefront 🙂

  3. Marvelous skills shown by the crew. God bless. Hope we go to the bottom of the root cause and take corrective actions

  4. As always, an exceptionally well covered write up on the latest accident involving a yet another catastrophic failure of a critical component involving the backbone fleet of rotary wing for the armed forces.

    Being born and having grown up in the ALH fleet for more than the last decade, it’s a third evident and directly attributable cause of an accident due to the “dreaded” Collective Booster Rod failure or the “I-end failure” , as colloquially known.

    Statistically, for the number of hours, flown by the entire fleet such an accident should be a remote possibility like a twin engine failure, perhaps to an even lesser degree being a control rod for the collective axis! But the chilling regularity, with which this particular failure has been happening calls for a serious accountability case for the HAL.

    Excellent recovery actions by the pilots to safely ditch the aircraft, the same as the preceding accident in the Northern Command with an exception being the crashworthiness of the latter also being tested, thankfully and miraculously resulting in minor injuries only.

    The social media give a glimpse of this accident with aircraft being recovered safely. The highlight being the EFG system, doing what it was designed for, to cushion the impact over a challenging terrain. I hope a similar limelight also falls on the cause of the failure, which again has emerged on the same social platforms, (perhaps restricted to inner circles only).

    Looking at the failed component, and the way it has given away, the manufacturer and all quality control agencies must be brought to justice for not paying sufficient heed to this serious issue and getting away under the garb of promoting “indigenous design”.

    Typical post accident checks are justified only for a “one time incident/accident” and not for “multiple time incident/accident”. HAL should not be allowed to brush this matter under the carpet of “One time checks” only. As a design flaw, a detailed investigation, and a thorough preventive measure, including fixing of accountability, is required to prevent any such accidents in the future.

    The possibility of installing something akin to a BUCS system on AH-64 Apache, which is a fly by wire back up system designed to give pilot control of the failed axis due to battle damage or control jam through SAS actuators needs to be explored.

    Hiding behind excuse of “Atmanirbharta”, quality control should not be allowed to be overlooked. Platforms like the LCH being ready on the production line for operational units, this grave failure only adds to similar component quality issues being potentially present in the growing spectrum of the manufacturers products.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.